[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200421195403.GA46589@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 22:54:03 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm/tpm_tis: Free IRQ if probing fails
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:23:19PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 4/16/20 6:07 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Call disable_interrupts() if we have to revert to polling in order not to
> > unnecessarily reserve the IRQ for the life-cycle of the driver.
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.5.x
> > Reported-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> > Fixes: e3837e74a06d ("tpm_tis: Refactor the interrupt setup")
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> I can confirm that this fixes the "irq 31 nobody cared" oops for me:
>
> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Hi, thanks a lot! Unfortunately I already put this out given the
criticality of the issue:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/20/1544
Sincere apologies that I couldn't include your tested-by but the most
important thing is to know that it works now.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists