[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200421210822.18994-1-wu000273@umn.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:08:22 -0500
From: wu000273@....edu
To: jejb@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...gic.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kjlu@....edu, wu000273@....edu
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: qla4xxx: Fix a potential race condition.
From: Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>
In the function qla4xxx_eh_abort, we should use lock protect both
kref_get() and kref_put(), because we must serialize access where a
kref_put() cannot occur during the kref_get(). Otherwise, the object
"srb" may not remain valid during the kref_get(), and a race condition
can happen.
Signed-off-by: Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>
---
drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c b/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c
index 5504ab11decc..a1400cadb91a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c
@@ -9222,8 +9222,10 @@ static int qla4xxx_eh_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
ha->host_no, id, lun));
wait = 1;
}
-
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ha->hardware_lock, flags);
kref_put(&srb->srb_ref, qla4xxx_srb_compl);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ha->hardware_lock, flags);
/* Wait for command to complete */
if (wait) {
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists