lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7af1fd261a54527be2ea2ab2656756f15452732.camel@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:55:21 -0300
From:   Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
To:     Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel@...labora.com, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] phy-rockchip-dphy-rx0: Drop unneeded CONFIG_OF
 dependency

On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 10:59 -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
> 
> On 4/1/20 6:37 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > The driver is perfectly capable of being built without CONFIG_OF.
> > Remove this dependency, which is useful for compile-only tests.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy-rx0/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy-rx0/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy-rx0/Kconfig
> > index bd0147624de1..fb74df829371 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy-rx0/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy-rx0/Kconfig
> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> >  
> >  config PHY_ROCKCHIP_DPHY_RX0
> >  	tristate "Rockchip MIPI Synopsys DPHY RX0 driver"
> > -	depends on (ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST) && OF
> > +	depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST

After discussing other similar patches, I'm starting to
think this was a bad idea.

Instead, we want to do have (ARCH_ROCKCHIP && OF) || COMPILE_TEST
as the other Rockchip PHYs.

Thanks,
Ezequiel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ