[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16175fa0-4d9b-2de8-e708-22b373a6f7a4@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:20:29 -0400
From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>
To: 1587181464-114215-1-git-send-email-bernard@...o.com,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com, Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] amdgpu: optimization-- reduce noneed mutex_lock area
Hi Bernard,
Thank you for the patch. Please see some comments inline.
Am 2020-04-20 um 10:25 p.m. schrieb Bernard Zhao:
> Maybe we could reduce the mutex_lock(&mem->lock)`s protected code area,
> and noneed to protect pr_debug.
Typo: noneed -> no need
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>
>
> Changes since V1:
> *commit message improve
>
> Link for V1:
> *https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1226588/
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> index 327317c54f7c..3c3769e57174 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> @@ -1285,17 +1285,18 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu(
> struct bo_vm_reservation_context ctx;
> struct ttm_validate_buffer *bo_list_entry;
> int ret;
> + unsigned int mapped_to_gpu_memory;
>
> mutex_lock(&mem->lock);
> + mapped_to_gpu_memory = mem->mapped_to_gpu_memory;
> + mutex_unlock(&mem->lock);
>
> - if (mem->mapped_to_gpu_memory > 0) {
> + if (mapped_to_gpu_memory > 0) {
> pr_debug("BO VA 0x%llx size 0x%lx is still mapped.\n",
> mem->va, bo_size);
> - mutex_unlock(&mem->lock);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&mem->lock);
> /* lock is not needed after this, since mem is unused and will
> * be freed anyway
> */
Please move this comment along with the mutex_unlock.
Regards,
Felix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists