[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200421055955.GA343434@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:59:55 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Evalds Iodzevics <evalds.iodzevics@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
ben@...adent.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode/intel: replace sync_core() with
native_cpuid_reg(eax)
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:53:44AM +0300, Evalds Iodzevics wrote:
> On Intel it is required to do CPUID(1) before reading the microcode
> revision MSR. Current code in 4.4 an 4.9 relies on sync_core() to call
> CPUID, unfortunately on 32 bit machines code inside sync_core() always
> jumps past CPUID instruction as it depends on data structure boot_cpu_data
> witch are not populated correctly so early in boot sequence.
>
> It depends on:
> commit 5dedade6dfa2 ("x86/CPU: Add native CPUID variants returning a single
> datum")
>
> This patch is for 4.4 but also should apply to 4.9
>
> Signed-off-by: Evalds Iodzevics <evalds.iodzevics@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Why are you not sending this to the stable mailing list like I have
pointed out numerous times by sending you a link to _how_ to get a patch
into the stable kernel trees?
Again, here it is:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
Please follow that so that we can do this correctly.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists