[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdopCtsB23bk058iHd2LGqecqot1nAsi5S8x72U4wiGCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:47:07 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] irq: make irq_domain_reset_irq_data() available
even for non-V2 users
pt., 17 kwi 2020 o 12:50 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> napisaĆ(a):
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:13 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > irq_domain_reset_irq_data() doesn't modify the parent data, so it can be
> > made available even if irq domain hierarchy is not being built. We'll
> > subsequently use it in irq_sim code.
>
>
> > @@ -475,7 +476,6 @@ extern int __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, int irq_base,
> > extern void irq_domain_free_irqs(unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs);
> > extern int irq_domain_activate_irq(struct irq_data *irq_data, bool early);
> > extern void irq_domain_deactivate_irq(struct irq_data *irq_data);
> > -
> > static inline int irq_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain,
> > unsigned int nr_irqs, int node, void *arg)
> > {
>
> Seems extra hunk slipped to the patch.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Indeed, I'll wait for more reviews though before resending.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists