[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73e2d20a-4009-c2f3-03b7-fcd29d098491@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:39:15 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/thp: Rename pmd_mknotpresent() as pmd_mknotvalid()
On 04/21/2020 12:37 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:57:26AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/21/2020 02:33 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:24:17AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> pmd_present() is expected to test positive after pmdp_mknotpresent() as the
>>>> PMD entry still points to a valid huge page in memory. pmdp_mknotpresent()
>>>> implies that given PMD entry is just invalidated from MMU perspective while
>>>> still holding on to pmd_page() referred valid huge page thus also clearing
>>>> pmd_present() test. This creates the following situation which is counter
>>>> intuitive.
>>>>
>>>> [pmd_present(pmd_mknotpresent(pmd)) = true]
>>>>
>>>> This renames pmd_mknotpresent() as pmd_mknotvalid() reflecting the helper's
>>>> functionality more accurately while changing the above mentioned situation
>>>> as follows. This does not create any functional change.
>>>>
>>>> [pmd_present(pmd_mknotvalid(pmd)) = true]
>>>>
>>>> This is not applicable for platforms that define own pmdp_invalidate() via
>>>> __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_INVALIDATE. Suggestion for renaming came during a previous
>>>> discussion here.
>>>
>>> Bikeshed alert: maybe pmd_mkinvalid() would be better, given that this is
>>> a one-trick pony for pmdp_invalidate()?
>>
>> I had thought about making it pmd_mkinvalid() earlier. But as we were replacing
>> pmd_mknotpresent(), hence went with similar pattern pmd_mknotvalid() which was
>> originally suggested by Catalin. There is an existing pte_mknotpresent() in arc
>> platform as well. I dont have a very strong opinion either way, will be happy
>> to rename. But then still wondering if we really need to.
>
> I just think that having pmdp_invalidate() call pmd_mkinvalid() makes a lot
> of sense and, since this is a pure renaming patch, then that's worth taking
> into consideration.
Sure np, will do.
>
> If you go with pmd_mkinvalid(), then:
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>
> Will
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists