linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add bus-width properties to mmc nodes for rk3328.dtsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v67vV2Bxff5Gj1R8Qx3Cj+nzA5ine12hoXbhGP5Z+S7=UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:29:49 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>
To:     Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add bus-width properties to mmc
 nodes for rk3328.dtsi

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 4:23 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
>
> Hi ChenYu,
>
> Am Dienstag, 21. April 2020, 05:48:52 CEST schrieb Chen-Yu Tsai:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:19 AM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > 'bus-width' and pinctrl containing the bus-pins
> > > should be in the same file, so add them to
> > > all mmc nodes in 'rk3328.dtsi'.
> >
> > Nope. First of all, pinctrl usage is with pinctrl-N properties, not the
> > pinctrl device, and there are no defaults set for any of the mmc nodes.
> > Second, these are board design specific. For example, boards are free to
> > use just 4 bits for the eMMC if they so desire. So this should be in each
> > board dts file. If a board is missing this property, fix the board.
>
> you are correct that the pinctrl entries are missing from the patches,
> bus-width and pinctrl should be defined in the same file each time,
> but for the whole idea I tend to disagree.
>
> So far every board with a Rockchip socs follows Rockchip's reference design
> for a lot of parts - for example I only see sdmmc nodes with bus-width=4
> etc.
>
> So the basic idea is to have default pinctrl settings for the settings
> everybody uses predefined ... if a board comes along that needs different
> settings it is free to redefine that.

I think having a default is a great idea. :)

ChenYu