[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200421092600.052543007@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:20:40 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: [patch V2 13/16] x86/tlb: Uninline nmi_uaccess_okay()
cpu_tlbstate is exported because various TLB related functions need access
to it, but cpu_tlbstate is sensitive information which should only be
accessed by well contained kernel functions and not be directly exposed to
modules.
nmi_access_ok() is the last inline function which requires access to
cpu_tlbstate. Move it into the TLB code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 33 +--------------------------------
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -247,38 +247,7 @@ struct tlb_state {
};
DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state, cpu_tlbstate);
-/*
- * Blindly accessing user memory from NMI context can be dangerous
- * if we're in the middle of switching the current user task or
- * switching the loaded mm. It can also be dangerous if we
- * interrupted some kernel code that was temporarily using a
- * different mm.
- */
-static inline bool nmi_uaccess_okay(void)
-{
- struct mm_struct *loaded_mm = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm);
- struct mm_struct *current_mm = current->mm;
-
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!loaded_mm);
-
- /*
- * The condition we want to check is
- * current_mm->pgd == __va(read_cr3_pa()). This may be slow, though,
- * if we're running in a VM with shadow paging, and nmi_uaccess_okay()
- * is supposed to be reasonably fast.
- *
- * Instead, we check the almost equivalent but somewhat conservative
- * condition below, and we rely on the fact that switch_mm_irqs_off()
- * sets loaded_mm to LOADED_MM_SWITCHING before writing to CR3.
- */
- if (loaded_mm != current_mm)
- return false;
-
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(current_mm->pgd != __va(read_cr3_pa()));
-
- return true;
-}
-
+bool nmi_uaccess_okay(void);
#define nmi_uaccess_okay nmi_uaccess_okay
void cr4_update_irqsoff(unsigned long set, unsigned long clear);
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -1079,6 +1079,38 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlb
put_cpu();
}
+/*
+ * Blindly accessing user memory from NMI context can be dangerous
+ * if we're in the middle of switching the current user task or
+ * switching the loaded mm. It can also be dangerous if we
+ * interrupted some kernel code that was temporarily using a
+ * different mm.
+ */
+bool nmi_uaccess_okay(void)
+{
+ struct mm_struct *loaded_mm = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm);
+ struct mm_struct *current_mm = current->mm;
+
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!loaded_mm);
+
+ /*
+ * The condition we want to check is
+ * current_mm->pgd == __va(read_cr3_pa()). This may be slow, though,
+ * if we're running in a VM with shadow paging, and nmi_uaccess_okay()
+ * is supposed to be reasonably fast.
+ *
+ * Instead, we check the almost equivalent but somewhat conservative
+ * condition below, and we rely on the fact that switch_mm_irqs_off()
+ * sets loaded_mm to LOADED_MM_SWITCHING before writing to CR3.
+ */
+ if (loaded_mm != current_mm)
+ return false;
+
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(current_mm->pgd != __va(read_cr3_pa()));
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static ssize_t tlbflush_read_file(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
Powered by blists - more mailing lists