| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <DM6PR02MB687640292EFB844B4BF9DA0DA7D50@DM6PR02MB6876.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:39:28 +0000
From: Vishal Sagar <vsagar@...inx.com>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>,
"laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com"
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC: Hyun Kwon <hyunk@...inx.com>, Hyun Kwon <hyunk@...inx.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"hans.verkuil@...co.com" <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dinesh Kumar <dineshk@...inx.com>,
Sandip Kothari <sandipk@...inx.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 2/2] media: v4l: xilinx: Add Xilinx MIPI CSI-2 Rx
Subsystem driver
Hi Luca,
Thanks for going through the patch and providing your feedback.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 4:00 PM
> To: Vishal Sagar <vsagar@...inx.com>; Hyun Kwon <hyunk@...inx.com>;
> laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com; mchehab@...nel.org;
> robh+dt@...nel.org; mark.rutland@....com; Michal Simek
> <michals@...inx.com>; linux-media@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; hans.verkuil@...co.com; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Dinesh Kumar
> <dineshk@...inx.com>; Sandip Kothari <sandipk@...inx.com>; Jacopo Mondi
> <jacopo@...ndi.org>
> Cc: Hyun Kwon <hyunk@...inx.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] media: v4l: xilinx: Add Xilinx MIPI CSI-2 Rx
> Subsystem driver
>
> Hi Vishal,
>
> thanks for having resumed this patchset!
>
> On 09/04/20 21:44, Vishal Sagar wrote:
> [...]
> > +static int xcsi2rxss_parse_of(struct xcsi2rxss_state *xcsi2rxss) {
> > + struct xcsi2rxss_core *core = &xcsi2rxss->core;
> > + struct device_node *node = xcsi2rxss->core.dev->of_node;
>
> Can be simplified as:
>
> struct device_node *node = core.dev->of_node;
>
Got it. Will update in next version.
struct device_node *node = core->dev->of_node
> > + unsigned int nports, irq;
> > + bool en_csi_v20, vfb;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + en_csi_v20 = of_property_read_bool(node, "xlnx,en-csi-v2-0");
> > + if (en_csi_v20)
> > + core->en_vcx = of_property_read_bool(node, "xlnx,en-vcx");
> > +
> > + core->enable_active_lanes =
> > + of_property_read_bool(node, "xlnx,en-active-lanes");
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "xlnx,csi-pxl-format",
> > + &core->datatype);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(core->dev, "missing xlnx,csi-pxl-format property\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + switch (core->datatype) {
> > + case XCSI_DT_YUV4228B:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RGB444:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RGB555:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RGB565:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RGB666:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RGB888:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RAW6:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RAW7:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RAW8:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RAW10:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RAW12:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RAW14:
> > + break;
> > + case XCSI_DT_YUV42210B:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RAW16:
> > + case XCSI_DT_RAW20:
> > + if (!en_csi_v20) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + dev_dbg(core->dev, "enable csi v2 for this pixel
> format");
> > + }
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(core->dev, "invalid csi-pxl-format property!\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + vfb = of_property_read_bool(node, "xlnx,vfb");
> > + if (!vfb) {
> > + dev_err(core->dev, "failed as VFB is disabled!\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (nports = 0; nports < XCSI_MEDIA_PADS; nports++) {
> > + struct fwnode_handle *ep;
> > + struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint vep = {
> > + .bus_type = V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY
> > + };
> > +
> > + ep = fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id(dev_fwnode(core-
> >dev),
> > + nports, 0,
> > +
> FWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NEXT);
> > + if (!ep)
> > + break;
> > + /*
> > + * since first port is sink port and it contains
> > + * all info about data-lanes and cfa-pattern,
> > + * don't parse second port but only check if exists
> > + */
> > + if (nports == XVIP_PAD_SOURCE) {
> > + dev_dbg(core->dev, "no need to parse source port");
> > + fwnode_handle_put(ep);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse(ep, &vep);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(core->dev, "error parsing sink port");
> > + fwnode_handle_put(ep);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(core->dev, "port %d bus type = %d\n", nports,
> > + vep.bus_type);
> > +
> > + if (vep.bus_type == V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
> > + dev_dbg(core->dev, "base.port = %d base.id = %d\n",
> > + vep.base.port, vep.base.id);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(core->dev, "mipi number lanes = %d\n",
> > + vep.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes);
> > +
> > + core->max_num_lanes =
> > + vep.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes;
> > + }
> > + fwnode_handle_put(ep);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (nports != XCSI_MEDIA_PADS) {
> > + dev_err(core->dev, "invalid number of ports %u\n", nports);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Register interrupt handler */
> > + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(core->dev, irq, xcsi2rxss_irq_handler,
> > + IRQF_SHARED, "xilinx-csi2rxss", xcsi2rxss);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(core->dev, "Err = %d Interrupt handler reg
> failed!\n",
> > + ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
> When using this driver I have changed this to a threaded IRQ, moving most of
> the management out of interrupt context. The patch is super simple and it
> works fine, for my use case at least. Do you think a strict IRQ is really needed
> for some reason?
>
Agree I should have moved this to a threaded IRQ. I will update it in next version.
> > + xcsi2rxss_log_ipconfig(xcsi2rxss);
> > +
> > + return 0;
>
> This function references 'core->dev' a lot of times, so I'd rather add at the
> top of the function:
>
> struct device * const dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> and then use simply 'dev' everywhere. This would keep lines shorter and
> more readable. It is also handy when copying/moving a line of code from
> one function to another if all of them have 'dev' called the same way so I
> tend to do use this pattern often.
>
Agree with you. It will be updated in next version.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int xcsi2rxss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > + struct v4l2_subdev *subdev;
> > + struct xcsi2rxss_state *xcsi2rxss;
> > + struct xcsi2rxss_core *core;
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + int num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(xcsi2rxss_clks);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + xcsi2rxss = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*xcsi2rxss),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!xcsi2rxss)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + core = &xcsi2rxss->core;
> > + core->dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> This function references 'dev' many times, sometimes as &pdev->dev, thers
> as 'core->dev', thus as above why not adding at the top of the
> function:
>
> struct device * const dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> and simplify code using 'dev' always?
>
True. I will do the change in next version.
> > + core->clks = devm_kmemdup(core->dev, xcsi2rxss_clks,
> > + sizeof(xcsi2rxss_clks), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!core->clks)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /* Reset GPIO */
> > + core->rst_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(core->dev, "reset",
> > + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > + if (IS_ERR(core->rst_gpio)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(core->rst_gpio) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + dev_err(core->dev, "Video Reset GPIO not setup in
> DT");
> > + return PTR_ERR(core->rst_gpio);
> > + }
> > +
> > + mutex_init(&xcsi2rxss->lock);
>
> There are 3 'return' statements after this call, and mutex_destroy() won't be
> called if they trigger. Ok, probably no real effect as
> mutex_init() is just initializing data, but for the sake of well-written code you
> can simply move mutex_init()...
>
> > + ret = xcsi2rxss_parse_of(xcsi2rxss);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > + core->iomem = devm_ioremap_resource(core->dev, res);
> > + if (IS_ERR(core->iomem))
> > + return PTR_ERR(core->iomem);
> > +
> > + ret = clk_bulk_get(core->dev, num_clks, core->clks);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(num_clks, core->clks);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_clk_put;
>
> ...here.
>
Good idea. This will be updated in next version.
> > + if (core->rst_gpio) {
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(core->rst_gpio, 1);
> > + /* minimum of 40 dphy_clk_200M cycles */
> > + usleep_range(1, 2);
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(core->rst_gpio, 0);
> > + }
>
>
> --
> Luca
Regards
Vishal Sagar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists