[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB0TPYEPMx4+507ENX5ErTFprJvV3_B6u9TWUSNd9BDhCVT70A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:46:44 +0200
From: Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Narayan Kamath <narayan@...gle.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] loop: Factor out configuring loop from status.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 3:49 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
>
> An additional question: since this function sets the status of 'lo'
> based on the information in 'info', would "loop_set_status" or
> "loop_set_status_from_info" be a better name for this function?
Yeah, I like the latter. I will rename, and add a comment that
explains the purpose more clearly.
Thanks,
Martijn
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists