[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k129gdx8.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 23:34:59 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: paulus@...ba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: read ibm,secure-memory nodes
Hi Laurent,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
> The newly introduced ibm,secure-memory nodes supersede the
> ibm,uv-firmware's property secure-memory-ranges.
Is either documented in a device tree binding document anywhere?
cheers
> Firmware will no more expose the secure-memory-ranges property so first
> read the new one and if not found rollback to the older one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> index 53b88cae3e73..ad950f8996e0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> @@ -735,6 +735,20 @@ static u64 kvmppc_get_secmem_size(void)
> const __be32 *prop;
> u64 size = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * First try the new ibm,secure-memory nodes which supersede the
> + * secure-memory-ranges property.
> + * If we found somes, no need to read the deprecated one.
> + */
> + for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "ibm,secure-memory") {
> + prop = of_get_property(np, "reg", &len);
> + if (!prop)
> + continue;
> + size += of_read_number(prop + 2, 2);
> + }
> + if (size)
> + return size;
> +
> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ibm,uv-firmware");
> if (!np)
> goto out;
> --
> 2.26.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists