[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mu74517d.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:05:10 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christof Meerwald <cmeerw@...erw.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove the no longer needed pid_alive() check in __task_pid_nr_ns()
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> writes:
> Starting from 2c4704756cab ("pids: Move the pgrp and session pid pointers
> from task_struct to signal_struct") __task_pid_nr_ns() doesn't dereference
> task->group_leader, we can remove the pid_alive() check.
>
> pid_nr_ns() has to check pid != NULL anyway, pid_alive() just adds the
> unnecessary confusion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
Good catch that does simplify things.
Eric
> kernel/pid.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
> index bc21c0fb26d8..47221db038e2 100644
> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -475,8 +475,7 @@ pid_t __task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type,
> rcu_read_lock();
> if (!ns)
> ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
> - if (likely(pid_alive(task)))
> - nr = pid_nr_ns(rcu_dereference(*task_pid_ptr(task, type)), ns);
> + nr = pid_nr_ns(rcu_dereference(*task_pid_ptr(task, type)), ns);
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return nr;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists