[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200421151537.19241-7-will@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:15:32 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/11] READ_ONCE: Simplify implementations of {READ,WRITE}_ONCE()
The implementations of {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() suffer from a significant
amount of indirection and complexity due to a historic GCC bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145
which was originally worked around by 230fa253df63 ("kernel: Provide
READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE").
Since GCC 4.8 is fairly vintage at this point and we emit a warning if
we detect it during the build, return {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() to their former
glory with an implementation that is easier to understand and, crucially,
more amenable to optimisation. A side effect of this simplification is
that WRITE_ONCE() no longer returns a value, but nobody seems to be
relying on that and the new behaviour is aligned with smp_store_release().
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/compiler.h | 118 +++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index 034b0a644efc..338111a448d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -177,60 +177,6 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val,
# define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __LINE__)
#endif
-#include <uapi/linux/types.h>
-
-#define __READ_ONCE_SIZE \
-({ \
- switch (size) { \
- case 1: *(__u8 *)res = *(volatile __u8 *)p; break; \
- case 2: *(__u16 *)res = *(volatile __u16 *)p; break; \
- case 4: *(__u32 *)res = *(volatile __u32 *)p; break; \
- case 8: *(__u64 *)res = *(volatile __u64 *)p; break; \
- default: \
- barrier(); \
- __builtin_memcpy((void *)res, (const void *)p, size); \
- barrier(); \
- } \
-})
-
-static __always_inline
-void __read_once_size(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
-{
- __READ_ONCE_SIZE;
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
-/*
- * We can't declare function 'inline' because __no_sanitize_address confilcts
- * with inlining. Attempt to inline it may cause a build failure.
- * https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
- * '__maybe_unused' allows us to avoid defined-but-not-used warnings.
- */
-# define __no_kasan_or_inline __no_sanitize_address notrace __maybe_unused
-#else
-# define __no_kasan_or_inline __always_inline
-#endif
-
-static __no_kasan_or_inline
-void __read_once_size_nocheck(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
-{
- __READ_ONCE_SIZE;
-}
-
-static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
-{
- switch (size) {
- case 1: *(volatile __u8 *)p = *(__u8 *)res; break;
- case 2: *(volatile __u16 *)p = *(__u16 *)res; break;
- case 4: *(volatile __u32 *)p = *(__u32 *)res; break;
- case 8: *(volatile __u64 *)p = *(__u64 *)res; break;
- default:
- barrier();
- __builtin_memcpy((void *)p, (const void *)res, size);
- barrier();
- }
-}
-
/*
* Prevent the compiler from merging or refetching reads or writes. The
* compiler is also forbidden from reordering successive instances of
@@ -240,11 +186,7 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
* statements.
*
* These two macros will also work on aggregate data types like structs or
- * unions. If the size of the accessed data type exceeds the word size of
- * the machine (e.g., 32 bits or 64 bits) READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() will
- * fall back to memcpy(). There's at least two memcpy()s: one for the
- * __builtin_memcpy() and then one for the macro doing the copy of variable
- * - '__u' allocated on the stack.
+ * unions.
*
* Their two major use cases are: (1) Mediating communication between
* process-level code and irq/NMI handlers, all running on the same CPU,
@@ -256,23 +198,49 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
#include <asm/barrier.h>
#include <linux/kasan-checks.h>
-#define __READ_ONCE(x, check) \
+#define __READ_ONCE(x) (*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x))
+
+#define READ_ONCE(x) \
({ \
- union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; \
- if (check) \
- __read_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); \
- else \
- __read_once_size_nocheck(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); \
- smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* Enforce dependency ordering from x */ \
- __u.__val; \
+ typeof(x) __x = __READ_ONCE(x); \
+ smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
+ __x; \
})
-#define READ_ONCE(x) __READ_ONCE(x, 1)
+
+#define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
+do { \
+ *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val); \
+} while (0)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
+/*
+ * We can't declare function 'inline' because __no_sanitize_address conflicts
+ * with inlining. Attempt to inline it may cause a build failure.
+ * https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
+ * '__maybe_unused' allows us to avoid defined-but-not-used warnings.
+ */
+# define __no_kasan_or_inline __no_sanitize_address notrace __maybe_unused
+#else
+# define __no_kasan_or_inline __always_inline
+#endif
+
+static __no_kasan_or_inline
+unsigned long __read_once_word_nocheck(const void *addr)
+{
+ return __READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)addr);
+}
/*
- * Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() instead of READ_ONCE() if you need
- * to hide memory access from KASAN.
+ * Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() instead of READ_ONCE() if you need to load a
+ * word from memory atomically but without telling KASAN. This is usually
+ * used by unwinding code when walking the stack of a running process.
*/
-#define READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(x) __READ_ONCE(x, 0)
+#define READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(x) \
+({ \
+ unsigned long __x = __read_once_word_nocheck(&(x)); \
+ smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
+ __x; \
+})
static __no_kasan_or_inline
unsigned long read_word_at_a_time(const void *addr)
@@ -281,14 +249,6 @@ unsigned long read_word_at_a_time(const void *addr)
return *(unsigned long *)addr;
}
-#define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
-({ \
- union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u = \
- { .__val = (__force typeof(x)) (val) }; \
- __write_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); \
- __u.__val; \
-})
-
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
/*
--
2.26.1.301.g55bc3eb7cb9-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists