[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200421150624.GA16684@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:06:24 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] MIPS: Fix some issues about arch_mem_init()
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:59:43PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> v3:
> - remove the Fixes tag of patch 2/3
>
> v2:
> - modify the subject of patch 3/3
>
> Tiezhu Yang (3):
> MIPS: Do not initialise globals to 0
> MIPS: Cleanup code about plat_mem_setup()
> MIPS: Make sparse_init() using top-down allocation
>
> arch/mips/include/asm/bootinfo.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
all three patches applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists