[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200422095038.152892240@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:56:54 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 084/100] clk: at91: usb: continue if clk_hw_round_rate() return zero
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
[ Upstream commit b0ecf1c6c6e82da4847900fad0272abfd014666d ]
clk_hw_round_rate() may call round rate function of its parents. In case
of SAM9X60 two of USB parrents are PLLA and UPLL. These clocks are
controlled by clk-sam9x60-pll.c driver. The round rate function for this
driver is sam9x60_pll_round_rate() which call in turn
sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(). In case the requested rate is not in the
proper range (rate < characteristics->output[0].min &&
rate > characteristics->output[0].max) the sam9x60_pll_round_rate() will
return a negative number to its caller (called by
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()). clk_hw_round_rate() will return zero in
case a negative number is returned by clk_core_round_rate_nolock(). With
this, the USB clock will continue its rate computation even caller of
clk_hw_round_rate() returned an error. With this, the USB clock on SAM9X60
may not chose the best parent. I detected this after a suspend/resume
cycle on SAM9X60.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1579261009-4573-2-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
index 8ab8502778a28..55e09641b491b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ static int at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
tmp_parent_rate = req->rate * div;
tmp_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(parent,
tmp_parent_rate);
+ if (!tmp_parent_rate)
+ continue;
+
tmp_rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(tmp_parent_rate, div);
if (tmp_rate < req->rate)
tmp_diff = req->rate - tmp_rate;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists