[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200422112831.339113081@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:27:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, qais.yousef@....com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
peterz@...radead.org, nico@...xnic.net, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH 02/23] sched,bL_switcher: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()
Because SCHED_FIFO is a broken scheduler model (see previous patches)
take away the priority field, the kernel can't possibly make an
informed decision.
In this case, use fifo_low, because it only cares about being above
SCHED_NORMAL. Effectively no change in behaviour.
Cc: nico@...xnic.net
Cc: rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c
@@ -270,12 +270,11 @@ static struct bL_thread bL_threads[NR_CP
static int bL_switcher_thread(void *arg)
{
struct bL_thread *t = arg;
- struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = 1 };
int cluster;
bL_switch_completion_handler completer;
void *completer_cookie;
- sched_setscheduler_nocheck(current, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
+ sched_set_fifo_low(current);
complete(&t->started);
do {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists