| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20200422125810.34847-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:58:04 +0800
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: pbonzini@...hat.com, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, paulus@...abs.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com,
cohuck@...hat.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, maz@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
christoffer.dall@....com, peterx@...hat.com, thuth@...hat.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: s390: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
In the current kvm version, 'kvm_run' has been included in the 'kvm_vcpu'
structure. Earlier than historical reasons, many kvm-related function
parameters retain the 'kvm_run' and 'kvm_vcpu' parameters at the same time.
This patch does a unified cleanup of these remaining redundant parameters.
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index e335a7e5ead7..d7bb2e7a07ff 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -4176,8 +4176,9 @@ static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return rc;
}
-static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
struct runtime_instr_cb *riccb;
struct gs_cb *gscb;
@@ -4235,7 +4236,7 @@ static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
}
if (vcpu->arch.gs_enabled) {
current->thread.gs_cb = (struct gs_cb *)
- &vcpu->run->s.regs.gscb;
+ &kvm_run->s.regs.gscb;
restore_gs_cb(current->thread.gs_cb);
}
preempt_enable();
@@ -4243,8 +4244,10 @@ static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
/* SIE will load etoken directly from SDNX and therefore kvm_run */
}
-static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
+
if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_PREFIX)
kvm_s390_set_prefix(vcpu, kvm_run->s.regs.prefix);
if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_CRS) {
@@ -4257,23 +4260,23 @@ static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc = kvm_run->s.regs.ckc;
}
save_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
- restore_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
+ restore_access_regs(kvm_run->s.regs.acrs);
/* save host (userspace) fprs/vrs */
save_fpu_regs();
vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fpc = current->thread.fpu.fpc;
vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.regs = current->thread.fpu.regs;
if (MACHINE_HAS_VX)
- current->thread.fpu.regs = vcpu->run->s.regs.vrs;
+ current->thread.fpu.regs = kvm_run->s.regs.vrs;
else
- current->thread.fpu.regs = vcpu->run->s.regs.fprs;
- current->thread.fpu.fpc = vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc;
+ current->thread.fpu.regs = kvm_run->s.regs.fprs;
+ current->thread.fpu.fpc = kvm_run->s.regs.fpc;
if (test_fp_ctl(current->thread.fpu.fpc))
/* User space provided an invalid FPC, let's clear it */
current->thread.fpu.fpc = 0;
/* Sync fmt2 only data */
if (likely(!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))) {
- sync_regs_fmt2(vcpu, kvm_run);
+ sync_regs_fmt2(vcpu);
} else {
/*
* In several places we have to modify our internal view to
@@ -4292,8 +4295,10 @@ static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
}
-static void store_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void store_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
+
kvm_run->s.regs.todpr = vcpu->arch.sie_block->todpr;
kvm_run->s.regs.pp = vcpu->arch.sie_block->pp;
kvm_run->s.regs.gbea = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gbea;
@@ -4313,8 +4318,10 @@ static void store_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
/* SIE will save etoken directly into SDNX and therefore kvm_run */
}
-static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
+
kvm_run->psw_mask = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask;
kvm_run->psw_addr = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr;
kvm_run->s.regs.prefix = kvm_s390_get_prefix(vcpu);
@@ -4324,16 +4331,16 @@ static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
kvm_run->s.regs.pft = vcpu->arch.pfault_token;
kvm_run->s.regs.pfs = vcpu->arch.pfault_select;
kvm_run->s.regs.pfc = vcpu->arch.pfault_compare;
- save_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
+ save_access_regs(kvm_run->s.regs.acrs);
restore_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
/* Save guest register state */
save_fpu_regs();
- vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc = current->thread.fpu.fpc;
+ kvm_run->s.regs.fpc = current->thread.fpu.fpc;
/* Restore will be done lazily at return */
current->thread.fpu.fpc = vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fpc;
current->thread.fpu.regs = vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.regs;
if (likely(!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu)))
- store_regs_fmt2(vcpu, kvm_run);
+ store_regs_fmt2(vcpu);
}
int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -4371,7 +4378,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
}
- sync_regs(vcpu, kvm_run);
+ sync_regs(vcpu);
enable_cpu_timer_accounting(vcpu);
might_fault();
@@ -4393,7 +4400,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
disable_cpu_timer_accounting(vcpu);
- store_regs(vcpu, kvm_run);
+ store_regs(vcpu);
kvm_sigset_deactivate(vcpu);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists