lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:07:51 -0400
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:     Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
Cc:     minchan@...nel.org, mgorman@...e.de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        mina86@...a86.com, shli@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jaewon31.kim@...il.com, ytk.lee@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmscan: count layzfree pages and fix nr_isolated_*
 mismatch

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 05:48:15PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> @@ -1295,11 +1295,15 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
>  		 */
>  		if (page_mapped(page)) {
>  			enum ttu_flags flags = ttu_flags | TTU_BATCH_FLUSH;
> +			bool lazyfree = PageAnon(page) && !PageSwapBacked(page);
>  
>  			if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page)))
>  				flags |= TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> +
>  			if (!try_to_unmap(page, flags)) {
>  				stat->nr_unmap_fail += nr_pages;
> +				if (lazyfree && PageSwapBacked(page))

This looks pretty strange, until you remember that try_to_unmap()
could SetPageSwapbacked again.

This might be more obvious?

			was_swapbacked = PageSwapBacked(page);
			if (!try_to_unmap(page, flags)) {
				stat->nr_unmap_fail += nr_pages;
				if (!was_swapbacked && PageSwapBacked(page))
> +					stat->nr_lazyfree_fail += nr_pages;
>  				goto activate_locked;

Or at least was_lazyfree.

> @@ -1491,8 +1495,8 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
>  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
>  		.may_unmap = 1,
>  	};
> -	struct reclaim_stat dummy_stat;
> -	unsigned long ret;
> +	struct reclaim_stat stat;
> +	unsigned long reclaimed;

nr_reclaimed would be better.

I also prefer keeping dummy_stat, since that's still what it is.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ