linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] padata: add separate cpuhp node for CPUHP_PADATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200422134635.dk44a4zy2rz6p3d3@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:46:35 -0400
From:   Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] padata: add separate cpuhp node for CPUHP_PADATA_DEAD

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 01:27:02PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi

Hi!

> v5.4.33: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     bfcdcef8c8e3 ("padata: update documentation")

Yes, it's a trivial conflict in the header comment for padata_instance.

> How should we proceed with this patch?

If mainline is ok with the change, I will send a 5.4-only version with the
resolution.

By the way, I should not have cc'd stable on the email, it was picked up from
the Cc: line in the patch.

Daniel