[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200422142235.GA2840@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:22:35 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] objtool: Rename elf_read() to elf_open_read()
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:32:04PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 'struct elf *' handling is an open/close paradigm, make sure the naming
> > matches that:
> >
> > elf_open_read()
> > elf_write()
> > elf_close()
>
>
> > diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
> > index f2a84271e807..12e2aea42bb2 100644
> > --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> > +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> > @@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ int check(const char *_objname, bool orc)
> >
> > objname = _objname;
> >
> > - file.elf = elf_read(objname, orc ? O_RDWR : O_RDONLY);
> > + file.elf = elf_open_read(objname, orc ? O_RDWR : O_RDONLY);
>
> Note that I have a patch pending that makes that unconditionally O_RDWR,
> which sort of seems to suggest elf_open() might be the better name.
Ok, done!
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists