lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200422153910.GN20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:39:10 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/23] sched,ion: Convert to sched_set_normal()

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 05:09:15PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > It's not unbounded, like a true idle-time scheduler would be, but it can
> > still be pretty horrible. nice19 has some of that too of course, but
> > idle has it worse, esp. also because it begs others to preempt it.
> 
> Yeah... you have to pay the benefit of letting other tasks to preempt
> faster. But both sched_idle and nice19 have the same weight 

#define WEIGHT_IDLEPRIO		3

 /*  15 */        36,        29,        23,        18,        15,

15 != 3

Also, like said elsewhere, idle is much more eager to let itself be
preempted.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ