lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:12:47 -0700 From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com> Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>, SElinux list <selinux@...r.kernel.org>, LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Nick Kralevich <nnk@...gle.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>, John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] SELinux support for anonymous inodes and UFFD On 4/22/2020 9:55 AM, James Morris wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Daniel Colascione wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 2:39 PM Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com> wrote: >>> Changes from the fourth version of the patch: >> >> Is there anything else that needs to be done before merging this patch series? > The vfs changes need review and signoff from the vfs folk, the SELinux > changes by either Paul or Stephen, and we also need signoff on the LSM > hooks from other major LSM authors (Casey and John, at a minimum). I haven't had the opportunity to test this relative to Smack. It's unclear whether the change would impact security modules that don't provide hooks for it. I will bump my priority on this, but it's still going to be a bit before I can get to it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists