[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17ce2fdc-4f9f-7772-c10c-6f339a4183e8@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:09:09 -0700
From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
<amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Kuehling, Felix" <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com>,
<nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH hmm 0/5] Adjust hmm_range_fault() API
On 4/21/20 5:21 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
>
> The API is a bit complicated for the uses we actually have, and
> disucssions for simplifying have come up a number of times.
>
> This small series removes the customizable pfn format and simplifies the
> return code of hmm_range_fault()
>
> All the drivers are adjusted to process in the simplified format.
> I would appreciated tested-by's for the two drivers, thanks!
For nouveau you can add:
Tested-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists