[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200422230709.19a81ef9@supah>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:07:14 +0200
From: "Erhard F." <erhard_f@...lbox.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Aishwarya R <aishwaryarj100@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: powermac: Simplify reading the "reg" and
"i2c-address" property
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:37:13 +0200
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 06:49:14PM +0530, Aishwarya R wrote:
> > >> Use of_property_read_u32 to read the "reg" and "i2c-address" property
> > >> instead of using of_get_property to check the return values.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Aishwarya R <aishwaryarj100@...il.com>
> >
> > > This is quite a fragile driver. Have you tested it on HW?
> >
> > This change is not tested with the Hardware.
> > But of_property_read_u32 is better here than generic of_get_property.
> > This make sure that value read properly independent of system endianess.
>
> This driver is only used on PPC_BE. And it is *very* fragile. The gain
> is not enough for me to accept it without testing. Maybe Erhard (CCed)
> is interested. If not, you may find someone on the ppc lists.
>
I applied the patch on top of kernel 5.6.6 and tested it on a PowerMac G4 3,6 DP and a PowerMac G5 11,2. Both machines run without anything suspicious going on. dmesg | grep i2c looks the same with patch and without patch.
Tested-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@...lbox.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists