lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:55:44 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Remove the pm_lock

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:33 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-04-21 10:29:08)
> >         case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED:
> >         case CPU_PM_EXIT:
> > -               cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &drv->cpus_entered_pm);
> > -               goto exit;
> > +               atomic_dec(&drv->cpus_in_pm);
> > +               return NOTIFY_OK;
> > +       default:
> > +               return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> Can this be split out and merged now? It's a bugfix for code that is in
> -next.

Sure.  I guess I had visions that the removal of the pm_lock would
make it into -next soon-ish too...

Interestingly, when testing the split-out patch I found that it wasn't
nearly as important as it appears.  Specifically we don't appear to
get cluster notifications except for a final one at the end of full
system suspend.  Grepping for cpu_cluster_pm_enter() the only calls
(other than the one from cpu_pm_suspend()) I see are in "arch/arm",
not arm64.

I've also split out my own bugfix about not getting notified about our
own failure.

v4 posted now...


-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ