[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9q=hMRjBG=SBX8gCC3qx-t1wdEwMOYx952m9HkByjiofA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 01:32:33 -0600
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH crypto-stable] crypto: arch/lib - limit simd usage to
PAGE_SIZE chunks
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:04 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> Seems this should just be a 'while' loop?
>
> while (bytes) {
> unsigned int todo = min_t(unsigned int, PAGE_SIZE, bytes);
>
> kernel_neon_begin();
> chacha_doneon(state, dst, src, todo, nrounds);
> kernel_neon_end();
>
> bytes -= todo;
> src += todo;
> dst += todo;
> }
The for(;;) is how it's done elsewhere in the kernel (that this patch
doesn't touch), because then we can break out of the loop before
having to increment src and dst unnecessarily. Likely a pointless
optimization as probably the compiler can figure out how to avoid
that. But maybe it can't. If you have a strong preference, I can
reactor everything to use `while (bytes)`, but if you don't care,
let's keep this as-is. Opinion?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists