[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2n7O0-jHLASdu9scgrG7iqETJV7Un843+fW3Yt4q=UhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:42:22 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] amba: Initialize dma_parms for amba devices
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:38 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> It's currently the amba driver's responsibility to initialize the pointer,
> dma_parms, for its corresponding struct device. The benefit with this
> approach allows us to avoid the initialization and to not waste memory for
> the struct device_dma_parameters, as this can be decided on a case by case
> basis.
>
> However, it has turned out that this approach is not very practical. Not
> only does it lead to open coding, but also to real errors. In principle
> callers of dma_set_max_seg_size() doesn't check the error code, but just
> assumes it succeeds.
>
> For these reasons, let's do the initialization from the common amba bus at
> the device registration point. This also follows the way the PCI devices
> are being managed, see pci_device_add().
>
> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists