[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200422102309.GA26846@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:23:09 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@...too.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: fix early boot crash on gcc-10
Ok,
let's try the simple and clean fix first. Nick, would that work on LLVM
too?
And I hope this will remain working and the compiler won't jump over an
inline asm and go nuts.
Thx.
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 3b9bf8c7e29d..06d2e16bedbb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -266,6 +266,13 @@ static void notrace start_secondary(void *unused)
wmb();
cpu_startup_entry(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE);
+
+ /*
+ * Prevent tail call to cpu_startup_entry() because the stack protector
+ * guard has been changed in the middle of this function and must not be
+ * checked before tail calling another function.
+ */
+ asm ("");
}
/**
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists