linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 101/118] net: dsa: bcm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200422095047.845206568@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:57:42 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 101/118] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Fix overflow checks

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>

commit d0802dc411f469569a537283b6f3833af47aece9 upstream.

Commit f949a12fd697 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix buffer overflow doing
set_rxnfc") tried to fix the some user controlled buffer overflows in
bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_set() and bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_del() but the fix was using
CFP_NUM_RULES, which while it is correct not to overflow the bitmaps, is
not representative of what the device actually supports. Correct that by
using bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size() instead.

The latter subtracts the number of rules by 1, so change the checks from
greater than or equal to greater than accordingly.

Fixes: f949a12fd697 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix buffer overflow doing set_rxnfc")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c
@@ -882,17 +882,14 @@ static int bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_set(struct d
 	     fs->m_ext.data[1]))
 		return -EINVAL;

-	if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY && fs->location >= CFP_NUM_RULES)
+	if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY &&
+	    fs->location > bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size(priv))
 		return -EINVAL;

 	if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY &&
 	    test_bit(fs->location, priv->cfp.used))
 		return -EBUSY;

-	if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY &&
-	    fs->location > bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size(priv))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	ret = bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_cmp(priv, port, fs);
 	if (ret == 0)
 		return -EEXIST;
@@ -973,7 +970,7 @@ static int bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_del(struct b
 	struct cfp_rule *rule;
 	int ret;

-	if (loc >= CFP_NUM_RULES)
+	if (loc > bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size(priv))
 		return -EINVAL;

 	/* Refuse deleting unused rules, and those that are not unique since