[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48afe770-83c3-03c0-c21f-334ab2056ea3@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:45:32 +0200
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.6 096/166] x86/xen: Make the boot CPU idle task reliable
On 22.04.20 11:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
>
> [ Upstream commit 2f62f36e62daec43aa7b9633ef7f18e042a80bed ]
>
> The unwinder reports the boot CPU idle task's stack on XEN PV as
> unreliable, which affects at least live patching. There are two reasons
> for this. First, the task does not follow the x86 convention that its
> stack starts at the offset right below saved pt_regs. It allows the
> unwinder to easily detect the end of the stack and verify it. Second,
> startup_xen() function does not store the return address before jumping
> to xen_start_kernel() which confuses the unwinder.
>
> Amend both issues by moving the starting point of initial stack in
> startup_xen() and storing the return address before the jump, which is
> exactly what call instruction does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
You'll need upstream d6f34f4c6b4a96 ("x86/xen: fix booting 32-bit pv
guest"), too.
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists