lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <119b9a64-b071-41e3-f690-89f4ac52bd7b@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:32:32 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, vkuznets@...hat.com, wei.huang2@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: check_nested_events if there is an
 injectable NMI

On 23/04/20 17:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
> Ah no, it's a bug in Cathy's patch and it's a weird one.
> 
> The problem is that on AMD you exit guest mode with the NMI latched and
> GIF=0.  So check_nested_events should enable the NMI window in addition
> to causing a vmexit.
> 
> So why does it work?  Because on AMD we don't have (yet)
> nested_run_pending, so we just check if we already have a vmexit
> scheduled and if so return -EBUSY.  The second call causes
> inject_pending_event to return -EBUSY and thus go through KVM_REQ_EVENT
> again, which enables the NMI window.

... and this means that suddenly your event handling series has become
twice as large so I'm taking it over.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ