| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200423214023.GA1153@rikard>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:40:23 +0200
From: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Haren Myneni <haren@...ibm.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 52/84] linux/bits.h: add compile time sanity
check of GENMASK inputs
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:57:35PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 09:40:32PM +0200, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 07:44:09AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > From: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
> > >
> > > [ Upstream commit 295bcca84916cb5079140a89fccb472bb8d1f6e2 ]
> > >
> > > GENMASK() and GENMASK_ULL() are supposed to be called with the high bit as
> > > the first argument and the low bit as the second argument. Mixing them
> > > will return a mask with zero bits set.
> > >
> > > Recent commits show getting this wrong is not uncommon, see e.g. commit
> > > aa4c0c9091b0 ("net: stmmac: Fix misuses of GENMASK macro") and commit
> > > 9bdd7bb3a844 ("clocksource/drivers/npcm: Fix misuse of GENMASK macro").
> > >
> > > To prevent such mistakes from appearing again, add compile time sanity
> > > checking to the arguments of GENMASK() and GENMASK_ULL(). If both
> > > arguments are known at compile time, and the low bit is higher than the
> > > high bit, break the build to detect the mistake immediately.
> > >
> > > Since GENMASK() is used in declarations, BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() must be used
> > > instead of BUILD_BUG_ON().
> > >
> > > __builtin_constant_p does not evaluate is argument, it only checks if it
> > > is a constant or not at compile time, and __builtin_choose_expr does not
> > > evaluate the expression that is not chosen. Therefore, GENMASK(x++, 0)
> > > does only evaluate x++ once.
> > >
> > > Commit 95b980d62d52 ("linux/bits.h: make BIT(), GENMASK(), and friends
> > > available in assembly") made the macros in linux/bits.h available in
> > > assembly. Since BUILD_BUG_OR_ZERO() is not asm compatible, disable the
> > > checks if the file is included in an asm file.
> > >
> > > Due to bugs in GCC versions before 4.9 [0], disable the check if building
> > > with a too old GCC compiler.
> > >
> > > [0]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> > > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > > Cc: Haren Myneni <haren@...ibm.com>
> > > Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > > Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> > > Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200308193954.2372399-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/bits.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/bits.h b/include/linux/bits.h
> > > index 669d69441a625..f108302a3121c 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/bits.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/bits.h
> > > @@ -18,12 +18,30 @@
> > > * position @h. For example
> > > * GENMASK_ULL(39, 21) gives us the 64bit vector 0x000000ffffe00000.
> > > */
> > > -#define GENMASK(h, l) \
> > > +#if !defined(__ASSEMBLY__) && \
> > > + (!defined(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || CONFIG_GCC_VERSION >= 49000)
> > > +#include <linux/build_bug.h>
> > > +#define GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) \
> > > + (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__builtin_choose_expr( \
> > > + __builtin_constant_p((l) > (h)), (l) > (h), 0)))
> > > +#else
> > > +/*
> > > + * BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO is not available in h files included from asm files,
> > > + * disable the input check if that is the case.
> > > + */
> > > +#define GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) 0
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#define __GENMASK(h, l) \
> > > (((~UL(0)) - (UL(1) << (l)) + 1) & \
> > > (~UL(0) >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h))))
> > > +#define GENMASK(h, l) \
> > > + (GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK(h, l))
> > >
> > > -#define GENMASK_ULL(h, l) \
> > > +#define __GENMASK_ULL(h, l) \
> > > (((~ULL(0)) - (ULL(1) << (l)) + 1) & \
> > > (~ULL(0) >> (BITS_PER_LONG_LONG - 1 - (h))))
> > > +#define GENMASK_ULL(h, l) \
> > > + (GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK_ULL(h, l))
> > >
> > > #endif /* __LINUX_BITS_H */
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
> > >
> >
> > This does not really fix anything, it's compile time prevention, so I
> > don't know how appropriate this is for stable (it was also picked for
> > 5.5 and 5.6, but I'm just replying here now, I can ping the other
> > selections if necessary if the patch should be dropped)?
> >
> > Also, for 5.4, it does somewhat depend on commit 8788994376d8
> > ("linux/build_bug.h: change type to int"). Without it, there may be a
> > subtle integer promotion issue if sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)
> > (I don't *think* such platform exists, but I don't have a warm a fuzzy
> > feeling about it).
>
> I'll drop it from this selection, but ideally I'd like to have it in.
>
> The codebase is different between Linus's tree and the stable trees, and
> I'm worried that some of these GENMASK issues were fixed upstream and
> not in the stable trees. Getting this patch back would help us fix those
> with minimal risk.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha
Ok, I see. If you think it's good to backport it to the stable trees,
I'm all for it. I've been thinking a bit about commit 8788994376d8
("linux/build_bug.h: change type to int"), I *think* it is probably fine
without it, but I'd rather be safe than sorry, but it's your call
really.
Rikard
Rikard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists