linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH] serial: amba-pl011: Make sure we initialize the port.lock spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:00:56 +0000
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] serial: amba-pl011: Make sure we initialize the port.lock spinlock

Valentine reported seeing:

[    3.626638] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[    3.626639] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[    3.626640] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[    3.626644] CPU: 7 PID: 51 Comm: kworker/7:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc2-00115-g8c2e9790f196 #116
[    3.626646] Hardware name: HiKey960 (DT)
[    3.626656] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
[    3.632476] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Optimal transfer size 8192 bytes not a multiple of physical block size (16384 bytes)
[    3.640220] Call trace:
[    3.640225]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1b8
[    3.640227]  show_stack+0x20/0x30
[    3.640230]  dump_stack+0xec/0x158
[    3.640234]  register_lock_class+0x598/0x5c0
[    3.640235]  __lock_acquire+0x80/0x16c0
[    3.640236]  lock_acquire+0xf4/0x4a0
[    3.640241]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0xa8
[    3.640245]  uart_add_one_port+0x388/0x4b8
[    3.640248]  pl011_register_port+0x70/0xf0
[    3.640250]  pl011_probe+0x184/0x1b8
[    3.640254]  amba_probe+0xdc/0x180
[    3.640256]  really_probe+0xe0/0x338
[    3.640257]  driver_probe_device+0x60/0xf8
[    3.640259]  __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xd0
[    3.640260]  bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xd8
[    3.640261]  __device_attach+0xe4/0x140
[    3.640263]  device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28
[    3.640265]  bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0
[    3.640266]  deferred_probe_work_func+0x7c/0xb8
[    3.640269]  process_one_work+0x2c0/0x768
[    3.640271]  worker_thread+0x4c/0x498
[    3.640272]  kthread+0x14c/0x158
[    3.640275]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c

Which seems to be due to the fact that after allocating the uap
structure, the pl011 code doesn't initialize the spinlock.

This patch fixes it by initializing the spinlock and the warning
has gone away.

CC: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
index 2296bb0f9578..458fc3d9d48c 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
@@ -2575,6 +2575,7 @@ static int pl011_setup_port(struct device *dev, struct uart_amba_port *uap,
 	uap->port.has_sysrq = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011_CONSOLE);
 	uap->port.flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF;
 	uap->port.line = index;
+	spin_lock_init(&uap->port.lock);
 
 	amba_ports[index] = uap;
 
-- 
2.17.1