[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1587683028.60741686@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:04:36 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Xu Wen" <wen.xu@...ech.edu>, "David Sterba" <dsterba@...e.com>,
"Gu Jinxiang" <gujx@...fujitsu.com>, "Qu Wenruo" <wqu@...e.com>,
"Ben Hutchings" <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 049/245] btrfs: tree-checker: Detect invalid and
empty essential trees
3.16.83-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
commit ba480dd4db9f1798541eb2d1c423fc95feee8d36 upstream.
A crafted image has empty root tree block, which will later cause NULL
pointer dereference.
The following trees should never be empty:
1) Tree root
Must contain at least root items for extent tree, device tree and fs
tree
2) Chunk tree
Or we can't even bootstrap as it contains the mapping.
3) Fs tree
At least inode item for top level inode (.).
4) Device tree
Dev extents for chunks
5) Extent tree
Must have corresponding extent for each chunk.
If any of them is empty, we are sure the fs is corrupted and no need to
mount it.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199847
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@...ech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Tested-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.4: Pass root instead of fs_info to generic_err()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -456,9 +456,22 @@ static int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root
* skip this check for relocation trees.
*/
if (nritems == 0 && !btrfs_header_flag(leaf, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_RELOC)) {
+ u64 owner = btrfs_header_owner(leaf);
struct btrfs_root *check_root;
- key.objectid = btrfs_header_owner(leaf);
+ /* These trees must never be empty */
+ if (owner == BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID ||
+ owner == BTRFS_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID ||
+ owner == BTRFS_EXTENT_TREE_OBJECTID ||
+ owner == BTRFS_DEV_TREE_OBJECTID ||
+ owner == BTRFS_FS_TREE_OBJECTID ||
+ owner == BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID) {
+ generic_err(root, leaf, 0,
+ "invalid root, root %llu must never be empty",
+ owner);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+ key.objectid = owner;
key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = (u64)-1;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists