linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add examples of secure- prefixed property in documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200423064808.10468-1-etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:48:06 +0200
From:   Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add examples of secure- prefixed property in documentation

Hello,

This is a proposal for adding a bit of description in the DT bindings
documentation of how secure- property prefix can be used for. The
changes in this patch series describe that for clocks and resets properties.

Documentation file arm/secure.txt already states that secure- prefix can be
used for any property hence the description proposed here are not mandated.
However it may be useful as explicit examples of such usage.

I will be very pleased to get your feedback in this changes.

Regards,

Etienne Carriere (2):
  dt-bindings: arm: Add secure-clocks binding description
  dt-bindings: arm: Add secure-resets binding description

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/secure.txt        | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

-- 
2.17.1