linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h7xan1cy.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:49:01 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc:     yhchuang@...ltek.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org (open list:REALTEK WIRELESS DRIVER
        (rtw88)), netdev@...r.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS),
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context

Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> writes:

> It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context.
>
> Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>

This fixes a regression, right? So there should be a Fixes line.

Also I can't take this until patch 1 is in my tree. And I don't know who
takes iopoll.h patches.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches