[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a1e2aa6-64b2-f642-1e19-d3f5684d70b3@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:26:04 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
tglx@...utronix.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
joel@...lfernandes.org, will@...nel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] kvm: Replace vcpu->swait with rcuwait
On 23/04/20 11:19, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>> 1) Davidlohr, please post only patches 1-3 to "equalize" the swait and
>> rcuwait APIs.
>>
>> 2) Peter, please prepare a topic branch for those, or provide Acked-by
> I don't think I have anything that conflicts with this, so sure, take
> the whole thing through KVM.
>
> For 1-3 (and I'll send a small niggle for 3 right after this):
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Great thanks. I assume you have no issue with rcuwait_active either.
Paolo
> I'll keep 5 as it is unrelated.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists