linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] clk: imx: introduce imx_clk_hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB6PR0402MB2760793865AA2E67E1C33F4488D30@DB6PR0402MB2760.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:53:37 +0000
From:   Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To:     Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC:     "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
        Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] clk: imx: introduce imx_clk_hw_critical

> Subject: RE: [PATCH] clk: imx: introduce imx_clk_hw_critical
> 
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 2:52 PM
> >
> > To i.MX8M SoC, there is an case is when running dual OSes with
> > hypervisor, the clk of the hardware that passthrough to the 2nd OS
> > needs to be setup by 1st Linux OS.
> > So detect clock-critical from ccm node and enable the clocks to let
> > the 2nd OS could use the hardware without touch CCM module.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/imx/clk.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++  drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> > |  1
> > +
> >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c index
> > 87ab8db3d282..ec7d422540c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> > @@ -177,3 +177,22 @@ static int __init imx_clk_disable_uart(void)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  late_initcall_sync(imx_clk_disable_uart);
> > +
> > +int imx_clk_hw_critical(struct device_node *np, struct clk_hw * const
> > +hws[]) {
> > +	struct property *prop;
> > +	const __be32 *cur;
> > +	u32 idx;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (!np || !hws)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	of_property_for_each_u32(np, "clock-critical", prop, cur, idx) {
> 
> Is there a binding for it already?

I think clock-critical is a common bindings? See of_clk_detect_critical.
Please review whether this approach is acceptable, if do
need bindings, I could add that in v2.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Regards
> Aisheng
> 
> > +		ret = clk_prepare_enable(hws[idx]->clk);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h index
> > d4ea1609bcb7..701d7440f98c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ extern spinlock_t imx_ccm_lock;
> >
> >  void imx_check_clocks(struct clk *clks[], unsigned int count);  void
> > imx_check_clk_hws(struct clk_hw *clks[], unsigned int count);
> > +int imx_clk_hw_critical(struct device_node *np, struct clk_hw * const
> > +hws[]);
> >  void imx_register_uart_clocks(struct clk ** const clks[]);  void
> > imx_mmdc_mask_handshake(void __iomem *ccm_base, unsigned int chn);
> > void imx_unregister_clocks(struct clk *clks[], unsigned int count);
> > --
> > 2.16.4