lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:27:02 +0300 From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>, yhchuang@...ltek.com, Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@...el.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iopoll: Introduce read_poll_timeout_atomic macro Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> writes: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 09:47:23AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> I don't know who maintains iopoll.h, at least MAINTAINERS file doesn't >> have an entry, so not sure how to handle this patch. > > Andrew Moton often picks up things like that, or if it's used by some > other patch as the original message indicated then often whoever picks > up the user can pick up the core change as well. Oh, ok. As patch 2 goes to my wireless-drivers-next tree would it be ok for everyone if I take this patch as well? -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists