[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200423112847.GF1136647@krava>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:28:47 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Haiyan Song <haiyanx.song@...el.com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Paul Clarke <pc@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] perf test: add expr test for pmu metrics
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 03:04:30PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
SNIP
> +
> +static int pmu_tests(void)
> +{
> + struct pmu_events_map *map;
> + struct pmu_event *pe;
> + int i, j, k;
> + const char **ids;
> + int idnum;
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct expr_parse_ctx ctx;
> + double result;
> +
> + i = 0;
> + for (;;) {
> + map = &pmu_events_map[i++];
> + if (!map->table) {
> + map = NULL;
> + break;
> + }
> + j = 0;
> + for (;;) {
> + pe = &map->table[j++];
> + if (!pe->name && !pe->metric_group && !pe->metric_name)
> + break;
> + if (!pe->metric_expr)
> + continue;
so we go throught all the metrics for the current cpu
and test the parsing on them.. great!
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists