[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200423125042.636198092@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:47:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: jpoimboe@...hat.com, alexandre.chartre@...cle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jthierry@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.cz,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] objtool: UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET should not check registers
From: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET will adjust a modified stack. However if a
callee-saved register was pushed on the stack then the stack frame
will still appear modified. So stop checking registers when
UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET is used.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200407073142.20659-3-alexandre.chartre@oracle.com
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -1513,6 +1513,14 @@ static bool has_modified_stack_frame(str
if (cfi->stack_size != initial_func_cfi.cfa.offset + ret_offset)
return true;
+ /*
+ * If there is a ret offset hint then don't check registers
+ * because a callee-saved register might have been pushed on
+ * the stack.
+ */
+ if (ret_offset)
+ return false;
+
for (i = 0; i < CFI_NUM_REGS; i++) {
if (cfi->regs[i].base != initial_func_cfi.regs[i].base ||
cfi->regs[i].offset != initial_func_cfi.regs[i].offset)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists