lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:25:38 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] KVM: nVMX: Preserve exception priority irrespective of exiting behavior

Short circuit vmx_check_nested_events() if an exception is pending and
needs to be injected into L2, priority between coincident events is not
dependent on exiting behavior.  This fixes a bug where a single-step #DB
that is not intercepted by L1 is incorrectly dropped due to servicing a
VMX Preemption Timer VM-Exit.

Injected exceptions also need to be blocked if nested VM-Enter is
pending or an exception was already injected, otherwise injecting the
exception could overwrite an existing event injection from L1.
Technically, this scenario should be impossible, i.e. KVM shouldn't
inject its own exception during nested VM-Enter.  This will be addressed
in a future patch.

Note, event priority between SMI, NMI and INTR is incorrect for L2, e.g.
SMI should take priority over VM-Exit on NMI/INTR, and NMI that is
injected into L2 should take priority over VM-Exit INTR.  This will also
be addressed in a future patch.

Fixes: b6b8a1451fc4 ("KVM: nVMX: Rework interception of IRQs and NMIs")
Reported-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index f228339cd0a0..dc7315b31fee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -3716,11 +3716,11 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	/*
 	 * Process any exceptions that are not debug traps before MTF.
 	 */
-	if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending &&
-	    !vmx_pending_dbg_trap(vcpu) &&
-	    nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu, &exit_qual)) {
+	if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending && !vmx_pending_dbg_trap(vcpu)) {
 		if (block_nested_events)
 			return -EBUSY;
+		if (!nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu, &exit_qual))
+			goto no_vmexit;
 		nested_vmx_inject_exception_vmexit(vcpu, exit_qual);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -3733,10 +3733,11 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending &&
-	    nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu, &exit_qual)) {
+	if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending) {
 		if (block_nested_events)
 			return -EBUSY;
+		if (!nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu, &exit_qual))
+			goto no_vmexit;
 		nested_vmx_inject_exception_vmexit(vcpu, exit_qual);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -3771,6 +3772,7 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+no_vmexit:
 	vmx_complete_nested_posted_interrupt(vcpu);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.26.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ