linux-kernel - [PATCH 10/13] KVM: x86: WARN on injected+pending exception even in nested case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200423022550.15113-11-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:25:47 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/13] KVM: x86: WARN on injected+pending exception even in nested case

WARN if a pending exception is coincident with an injected exception
before calling check_nested_events() so that the WARN will fire even if
inject_pending_event() bails early because check_nested_events() detects
the conflict.  Bailing early isn't problematic (quite the opposite), but
suppressing the WARN is undesirable as it could mask a bug elsewhere in
KVM.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 6af873b7e0ae..7c49a7dc601f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7693,6 +7693,9 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			kvm_x86_ops.set_irq(vcpu);
 	}
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.exception.injected &&
+		     vcpu->arch.exception.pending);
+
 	/*
 	 * Call check_nested_events() even if we reinjected a previous event
 	 * in order for caller to determine if it should require immediate-exit
@@ -7711,7 +7714,6 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 					vcpu->arch.exception.has_error_code,
 					vcpu->arch.exception.error_code);
 
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.exception.injected);
 		vcpu->arch.exception.pending = false;
 		vcpu->arch.exception.injected = true;
 
-- 
2.26.0