[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200423022550.15113-13-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:25:49 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] KVM: x86: Replace late check_nested_events() hack with more precise fix
Add a separate hook for checking if interrupt injection is blocked and
use the hook to handle the case where an interrupt arrives between
check_nested_events() and the injection logic. Drop the retry of
check_nested_events() that hack-a-fixed the same condition.
Blocking injection is also a bit of a hack, e.g. KVM should do exiting
and non-exiting interrupt processing in a single pass, but it's a more
precise hack. The old comment is also misleading, e.g. KVM_REQ_EVENT is
purely an optimization, setting it on every run loop (which KVM doesn't
do) should not affect functionality, only performance.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 13 +++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 22 ++++------------------
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 787636acd648..16fdeddb4a65 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1140,6 +1140,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
void (*queue_exception)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void (*cancel_injection)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
bool (*interrupt_allowed)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+ bool (*interrupt_injection_allowed)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
bool (*nmi_allowed)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
bool (*get_nmi_mask)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void (*set_nmi_mask)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool masked);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index f21f734861dd..6d3ccbfc9e6a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -3993,6 +3993,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __initdata = {
.queue_exception = svm_queue_exception,
.cancel_injection = svm_cancel_injection,
.interrupt_allowed = svm_interrupt_allowed,
+ .interrupt_injection_allowed = svm_interrupt_allowed,
.nmi_allowed = svm_nmi_allowed,
.get_nmi_mask = svm_get_nmi_mask,
.set_nmi_mask = svm_set_nmi_mask,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 2f8cacb3aa9b..68b3748b5383 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -4550,6 +4550,18 @@ static bool vmx_interrupt_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return !vmx_interrupt_blocked(vcpu);
}
+static bool vmx_interrupt_injection_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ /*
+ * An IRQ must not be injected into L2 if it's supposed to VM-Exit,
+ * e.g. if the IRQ arrived asynchronously after checking nested events.
+ */
+ if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_exit_on_intr(vcpu))
+ return false;
+
+ return vmx_interrupt_allowed(vcpu);
+}
+
static int vmx_set_tss_addr(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int addr)
{
int ret;
@@ -7823,6 +7835,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __initdata = {
.queue_exception = vmx_queue_exception,
.cancel_injection = vmx_cancel_injection,
.interrupt_allowed = vmx_interrupt_allowed,
+ .interrupt_injection_allowed = vmx_interrupt_injection_allowed,
.nmi_allowed = vmx_nmi_allowed,
.get_nmi_mask = vmx_get_nmi_mask,
.set_nmi_mask = vmx_set_nmi_mask,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 7c49a7dc601f..d9d6028a77e0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7755,24 +7755,10 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
--vcpu->arch.nmi_pending;
vcpu->arch.nmi_injected = true;
kvm_x86_ops.set_nmi(vcpu);
- } else if (kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(vcpu)) {
- /*
- * Because interrupts can be injected asynchronously, we are
- * calling check_nested_events again here to avoid a race condition.
- * See https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/2/60 for discussion about this
- * proposal and current concerns. Perhaps we should be setting
- * KVM_REQ_EVENT only on certain events and not unconditionally?
- */
- if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && kvm_x86_ops.check_nested_events) {
- r = kvm_x86_ops.check_nested_events(vcpu);
- if (r != 0)
- return r;
- }
- if (kvm_x86_ops.interrupt_allowed(vcpu)) {
- kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu),
- false);
- kvm_x86_ops.set_irq(vcpu);
- }
+ } else if (kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(vcpu) &&
+ kvm_x86_ops.interrupt_injection_allowed(vcpu)) {
+ kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu), false);
+ kvm_x86_ops.set_irq(vcpu);
}
return 0;
--
2.26.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists