linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 04/10] PM / EM: add support for other devices than CPUs in Energy Model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:57:45 +0100
From:   Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-imx@....com, Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
        b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, sudeep.holla@....com,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, nm@...com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        rui.zhang@...el.com, amit.kucheria@...durent.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        qperret@...gle.com, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, khilman@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, steven.price@....com,
        tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com, alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com,
        airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, liviu.dudau@....com,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, patrick.bellasi@...bug.net,
        orjan.eide@....com, rdunlap@...radead.org, mka@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/10] PM / EM: add support for other devices than CPUs
 in Energy Model



On 4/23/20 4:12 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:42:04AM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> Add support for other devices that CPUs. The registration function
>> does not require a valid cpumask pointer and is ready to handle new
>> devices. Some of the internal structures has been reorganized in order to
>> keep consistent view (like removing per_cpu pd pointers). To track usage
>> of the Energy Model structures, they are protected with kref.
> 
> Why not add the energy model structure in the struct device directly?

Do you mean this structure?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/device.h#L537

and to put something like:
struct device {
...
	struct dev_pm_domain	*pm_domain;
#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL
	struct em_perf_domain	*em_pd;
#endif
...
};

> 
> For instance for the em_cpu_get() function, the cpu id allows to retrieve the
> cpu device and then from there, the energy model instead of browsing another
> list. The em_device life cycle will be tied to the struct device.

That would be perfect.

> 
> Then when the struct device and the em_device are connected, add the debugfs
> with a struct device list for those which are energy aware, so you end up with
> a structure:
> 
> struct em_device {
> 	struct device *dev;
> 	struct list_head em_dev_list;
> };
> 
> (a global single dentry for debugfs to do a recursive delete is enough).
> 
> Locks when inspecting and add/removal called from the struct device release
> function. So no need of an extra refcounting.
> 
> Does it make sense?
> 

Indeed it looks much cleaner/simpler.

I will try to address this idea and get rid of refcounting.

This should be doable in this patch (4/10). In the v7 I will keep your
ACKs for other patches that you have already commented.

Thank you for your suggestions and review.

Regards,
Lukasz