[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200424192222.28efd55f@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 19:22:22 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<vigneshr@...com>, <tony@...mide.com>, <richard@....at>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mfd: stm32-fmc2: add STM32 FMC2 controller
driver
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:42:59 +0200
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com> wrote:
> On 4/24/20 5:14 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:47:34 +0200
> > Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/24/20 1:06 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On 4/24/20 12:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 4/24/20 9:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020, Christophe Kerello wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The driver adds the support for the STMicroelectronics FMC2 controller
> >>>>>>> found on STM32MP SOCs.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The FMC2 functional block makes the interface with: synchronous and
> >>>>>>> asynchronous static memories (such as PSNOR, PSRAM or other
> >>>>>>> memory-mapped peripherals) and NAND flash memories.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>> Changes in v2:
> >>>>>>> - remove ops from stm32_fmc2 structure
> >>>>>>> - add 2 APIs to manage FMC2 enable/disable
> >>>>>>> - add 2 APIs to manage FMC2 NWAIT shared signal
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 12 +++
> >>>>>>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> >>>>>>> drivers/mfd/stm32-fmc2.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>> include/linux/mfd/stm32-fmc2.h | 225 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>> 4 files changed, 374 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stm32-fmc2.c
> >>>>>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stm32-fmc2.h
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >>>>>>> index 2b20329..5260582 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >>>>>>> @@ -1922,6 +1922,18 @@ config MFD_ROHM_BD71828
> >>>>>>> Also included is a Coulomb counter, a real-time clock (RTC), and
> >>>>>>> a 32.768 kHz clock gate.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +config MFD_STM32_FMC2
> >>>>>>> + tristate "Support for FMC2 controllers on STM32MP SoCs"
> >>>>>>> + depends on MACH_STM32MP157 || COMPILE_TEST
> >>>>>>> + select MFD_CORE
> >>>>>>> + select REGMAP
> >>>>>>> + select REGMAP_MMIO
> >>>>>>> + help
> >>>>>>> + Select this option to enable STM32 FMC2 driver used for FMC2 External
> >>>>>>> + Bus Interface controller and FMC2 NAND flash controller. This driver
> >>>>>>> + provides core support for the STM32 FMC2 controllers, in order to use
> >>>>>>> + the actual functionality of the device other drivers must be enabled.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not sure how many times I have to say this before people stop
> >>>>>> attempting to pass these kinds of relationships off as MFDs:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A memory device and its bus is not an MFD. In a similar vain to the
> >>>>>> thousands of USB, I2C, SPI, PCI and the like devices that aren't MFDs
> >>>>>> either.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please find another way to associate your device with its bus.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This FMC2 is however an IP which can either operate external devices
> >>>>> (like ethernet chip on this parallel bus) or external flashes (like NOR
> >>>>> and NAND chips).
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm sure that it *can*. Although that's not its main purpose.
> >>>
> >>> I use it to operate KSZ8851-16MLL ethernet chip, which has async bus
> >>> interface. Linux just didn't have support for that mode of operation
> >>> thus far and the FMC was used to operate NANDs and NORs only. This
> >>> series, or rather, the first three patches in this series, add support
> >>> for operating other bus devices, like this ethernet controller.
> >>>
> >>>> The
> >>>> clue is in the nomenclature ("Flexible *Memory* Controller"). Nor is
> >>>> it how the device is being used in this submission:
> >>>>
> >>>> "The FMC2 functional block makes the interface with: synchronous and
> >>>> asynchronous static memories (such as PSNOR, PSRAM or other
> >>>> memory-mapped peripherals) and NAND flash memories."
> >>>>
> >>>> As I mentioned, this is just another memory device and its bus.
> >>>
> >>> I don't think it's _just_ a memory controller, it's more universal than
> >>> that, see above. Note that SRAM interface basically boils down to
> >>> anything which has external parallel bus, e.g. Davicom DM9000, that
> >>> KSZ8851-16MLL etc.
> >>>
> >>>>> Can you provide a suggestion how this should be handled, if not as MFD?
> >>>>> It seems to me, that this is a Multi-Function Device .
> >>>>
> >>>> Simply move it into the MTD or Memory subsystems and set up the
> >>>> dependencies via Kconfig.
> >>>>
> >>>>> If this discussion is a recurring topic, is there some documentation
> >>>>> which explains how such devices should be handled ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Not that I'm aware of.
> >>>
> >>> I see.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Lee, Marek,
> >>
> >> I will move this source code in the FMC2 bus driver. I think that I
> >> should be able to manage the 2 controllers with 2 drivers (the FMC2 bus
> >> driver and the FMC2 raw NAND driver).
> >
> > FWIW, that's what I did for the Atmel EBI (External Bus Interface)
> > controller (see [1]).
> >
> > [1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6/source/drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c
> >
>
> Hi Boris,
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> I was thinking about the bindings and I think that the bindings below
> are close to what has been done for Atmel EBI/Raw NAND bindings (in
> terms of structure of bindings if I have well understood).
> I think that these proposed bindings are very close to the first
> proposed version (V1/V2).
Yep, makes sense to me, just one minor comment.
>
> fmc@...02000 {
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> compatible = "st,stm32mp1-fmc2";
> reg = <0x58002000 0x1000>;
> clocks = <&rcc FMC_K>;
> resets = <&rcc FMC_R>;
>
> ranges = <0 0 0x60000000 0x4000000>, /* EBI bank 1 */
> <1 0 0x64000000 0x4000000>, /* EBI bank 2 */
> <2 0 0x68000000 0x4000000>, /* EBI bank 3 */
> <3 0 0x6c000000 0x4000000>, /* EBI bank 4 */
> <4 0 0x80000000 0x4000000>, /* NAND common memory space */
> <5 0 0x88000000 0x4000000>; /* NAND attribute memory
> space */
>
> psram@0 {
> compatible = "mtd-ram";
> reg = <0 0x00000000 0x100000>;
> bank-width = <2>;
>
> st,fmc2_ebi_cs_transaction_type = <1>;
> st,fmc2_ebi_cs_address_setup = <60>;
> st,fmc2_ebi_cs_data_setup = <30>;
> st,fmc2_ebi_cs_bus_turnaround = <5>;
Not sure what the unit is for those timings, but I'd recommend using a
time unit (nanoseconds?) and not clk-cycles here.
> };
>
> nand-controller@4 {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> compatible = "st,stm32mp15-fmc2";
> reg = <4 0x00000000 0x1000>,
> <5 0x00010000 0x1000>,
> <5 0x00020000 0x1000>,
> <4 0x01000000 0x1000>,
> <5 0x01010000 0x1000>,
> <5 0x01020000 0x1000>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 48 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> dmas = <&mdma1 20 0x2 0x12000a02 0x0 0x0>,
> <&mdma1 20 0x2 0x12000a08 0x0 0x0>,
> <&mdma1 21 0x2 0x12000a0a 0x0 0x0>;
> dma-names = "tx", "rx", "ecc";
>
> nand@0 {
> reg = <0>;
> nand-on-flash-bbt;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> };
> };
> };
>
> Regards,
> Christophe Kerello.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists