lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 10:28:29 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Remove tcs_is_free() API Quoting Doug Anderson (2020-04-24 10:12:04) > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 9:54 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote: > > + unsigned long i; > > > > - for (i = 0; i < tcs->num_tcs; i++) { > > - if (tcs_is_free(tcs->drv, tcs->offset + i)) > > - return tcs->offset + i; > > - } > > + i = find_next_zero_bit(drv->tcs_in_use, MAX_TCS_NR, tcs->offset); > > Rather than passing MAX_TCS_NR would it be legit to pass "tcs->offset > + tcs->num_tcs"? You are passing that as "size" above in > check_for_req_inflight(). Yeah I think that should work. I'll roll it in.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists