[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200424031959.GB11244@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 03:19:59 +0000
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
rishabhb@...eaurora.org, maco@...roid.com, andy.gross@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
shuah@...nel.org, mfuzzey@...keon.com, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, pali.rohar@...il.com, tiwai@...e.de,
arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com, zajec5@...il.com, nbroeking@...com,
markivx@...eaurora.org, broonie@...nel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Abhay_Salunke@...l.com,
jewalt@...innovations.com, cantabile.desu@...il.com, ast@...com,
andresx7@...il.com, dan.rue@...aro.org, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
yzaikin@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware_loader: re-export fw_fallback_config into
firmware_loader's own namespace
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 01:15:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:14:20 +0000 Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > Fixes: "firmware_loader: remove unused exports"
> > >
> > > Can't help but notice this strange form of the Fixes tag, is it
> > > intentional?
> >
> > Yeah, no there is no commit for the patch as the commit is ephemeral in
> > a development tree not yet upstream, ie, not on Linus' tree yet. Using a
> > commit here then makes no sense unless one wants to use a reference
> > development tree in this case, as development trees are expected to
> > rebase to move closer towards Linus' tree. When a tree rebases, the
> > commit IDs change, and this is why the commit is ephemeral unless
> > one uses a base tree / branch / tag.
>
> That commit is in Greg's driver-core tree which never rebases, so the
> SHA1 can be considered immutable. This is (should be) true for most
> trees that are published in linux-next (I know it is not true for some).
Cool, but once merged on Linus' tree, I think it gets yet-another-commit
ID right? So someone looking for:
git show commit-id-on-gregs-driver-core-tree
It would not work? Or would it?
Luis
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists