linux-kernel - [regression] Re: [PATCH v6 06/12] mm/gup: track FOLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200424121846.5ee2685f@w520.home>
Date:   Fri, 24 Apr 2020 12:18:46 -0600
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:     John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [regression] Re: [PATCH v6 06/12] mm/gup: track FOLL_PIN pages

On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:15:30 -0800
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:

> Add tracking of pages that were pinned via FOLL_PIN. This tracking is
> implemented via overloading of page->_refcount: pins are added by
> adding GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS (1024) to the refcount. This provides a
> fuzzy indication of pinning, and it can have false positives (and that's
> OK). Please see the pre-existing
> Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst for details.
> 
> As mentioned in pin_user_pages.rst, callers who effectively set FOLL_PIN
> (typically via pin_user_pages*()) are required to ultimately free such
> pages via unpin_user_page().
> 
> Please also note the limitation, discussed in pin_user_pages.rst under
> the "TODO: for 1GB and larger huge pages" section. (That limitation will
> be removed in a following patch.)
> 
> The effect of a FOLL_PIN flag is similar to that of FOLL_GET, and may be
> thought of as "FOLL_GET for DIO and/or RDMA use".
> 
> Pages that have been pinned via FOLL_PIN are identifiable via a
> new function call:
> 
>    bool page_maybe_dma_pinned(struct page *page);
> 
> What to do in response to encountering such a page, is left to later
> patchsets. There is discussion about this in [1], [2], [3], and [4].
> 
> This also changes a BUG_ON(), to a WARN_ON(), in follow_page_mask().
> 
> [1] Some slow progress on get_user_pages() (Apr 2, 2019):
>     https://lwn.net/Articles/784574/
> [2] DMA and get_user_pages() (LPC: Dec 12, 2018):
>     https://lwn.net/Articles/774411/
> [3] The trouble with get_user_pages() (Apr 30, 2018):
>     https://lwn.net/Articles/753027/
> [4] LWN kernel index: get_user_pages():
>     https://lwn.net/Kernel/Index/#Memory_management-get_user_pages
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Suggested-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst |   6 +-
>  include/linux/mm.h                        |  82 +++++--
>  mm/gup.c                                  | 254 +++++++++++++++++-----
>  mm/huge_memory.c                          |  29 ++-
>  mm/hugetlb.c                              |  54 +++--
>  5 files changed, 334 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)

Hi John,

I'm seeing a regression bisected back to this commit (3faa52c03f44
mm/gup: track FOLL_PIN pages).  I've attached some vfio-pci test code
that reproduces this by mmap'ing a page of MMIO space of a device and
then tries to map that through the IOMMU, so this should be attempting
a gup/pin of a PFNMAP page.  Previously this failed gracefully (-EFAULT),
but now results in:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffae5cbfe5e938
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0 
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
CPU: 18 PID: 3365 Comm: vfio-pci-dma-ma Tainted: G           OE     5.6.0+ #6
Hardware name: AMD Corporation Diesel/Diesel, BIOS TDL100CB 03/17/2020
RIP: 0010:get_pfnblock_flags_mask+0x22/0x70
Code: c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 05 bc e1 d9 01 48 89 f7 49 89 c8 48 c1 ef 0f 48 85 c0 74 48 48 89 f1 48 c1 e9 17 <48> 8b 04 c8 48 85 c0 74 0b 40 0f b6 ff 48 c1 e7 04 48 01 f8 48 c1
RSP: 0018:ffffb55289b3fcc8 EFLAGS: 00010216
RAX: ffff9e5cbff50000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 000001fffffe1d27
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffff0e93acd633 RDI: 0001fffffe1d2759
RBP: ffffb55289b3fd88 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: ffff9e48a52476a8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff9e48ab358cc0
FS:  00007f4ef7269740(0000) GS:ffff9e48afa80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ffffae5cbfe5e938 CR3: 0000000c61eda000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
Call Trace:
 __gup_longterm_locked+0x274/0x620
 vaddr_get_pfn+0x74/0x110 [vfio_iommu_type1]
 vfio_pin_pages_remote+0x6e/0x370 [vfio_iommu_type1]
 vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl+0x8e5/0xaac [vfio_iommu_type1]
 ksys_ioctl+0x86/0xc0
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1f0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x7f4ef6d7d307
Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 05 69 1b 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 39 1b 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fff76ada738 EFLAGS: 00000213 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f4ef6d7d307
RDX: 00007fff76ada760 RSI: 0000000000003b71 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fff76ada930 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000213 R12: 0000000000400950
R13: 00007fff76adaa10 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
Modules linked in: vfio_pci(OE) vfio_virqfd(OE) vfio_iommu_type1(OE) vfio(OE) amd64_edac_mod edac_mce_amd kvm_amd kvm rfkill sunrpc ipmi_ssif vfat irqbypass fat ipmi_si crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul sp5100_tco ghash_clmulni_intel ipmi_devintf pcspkr joydev ccp i2c_piix4 k10temp ipmi_msghandler pinctrl_amd acpi_cpufreq ip_tables nouveau ast video mxm_wmi drm_vram_helper wmi drm_ttm_helper i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper cec ttm drm i40e e1000e crc32c_intel
CR2: ffffae5cbfe5e938
---[ end trace a384ab7cc8e37d46 ]---
RIP: 0010:get_pfnblock_flags_mask+0x22/0x70
Code: c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 05 bc e1 d9 01 48 89 f7 49 89 c8 48 c1 ef 0f 48 85 c0 74 48 48 89 f1 48 c1 e9 17 <48> 8b 04 c8 48 85 c0 74 0b 40 0f b6 ff 48 c1 e7 04 48 01 f8 48 c1
RSP: 0018:ffffb55289b3fcc8 EFLAGS: 00010216
RAX: ffff9e5cbff50000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 000001fffffe1d27
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffff0e93acd633 RDI: 0001fffffe1d2759
RBP: ffffb55289b3fd88 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: ffff9e48a52476a8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff9e48ab358cc0
FS:  00007f4ef7269740(0000) GS:ffff9e48afa80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ffffae5cbfe5e938 CR3: 0000000c61eda000 CR4: 00000000003406e0

Thanks,
Alex

View attachment "vfio-pci-dma-map-mmio.c" of type "text/x-c++src" (4877 bytes)